By Kim Whitaker
Are you hoping to get someone to invest in your business? Or perhaps you’re thinking about working with a business partner in a collaboration arrangement or joint venture?
If you are, you are probably worried about how you will protect the confidential information about your business.
You’ve probably heard the terms “NDA” (short for Non-Disclosure Agreement) and Confidentiality Agreement. But how are these agreements relevant and what do you need to think about?
The first thing to say is that an NDA and a Confidentiality Agreement are just different names for what is the same type of agreement – that is, one that says information disclosed by one party to another must be kept secret and not disclosed to third parties.
You may be thinking that as an NDA/Confidentiality Agreement is a legal document, it will be expensive to put in place. And anyway, hasn’t someone told you that there is no point in having one because you won’t be able to afford to enforce it?
These are common misunderstandings. I want to make it clear that this is not the case and give you an idea of what are the key things that you need to know.
1. Is it worth putting an NDA in place?
Yes, in my view, it is. You should always enter into one of these types of Agreement, preferably before sharing any information (although they can be made retrospective to cover information already disclosed).
The mere fact that a document of this kind has been signed will remind the other party of their obligations and act as a disincentive to any breach.
Admittedly, if you did have to go through the full process of enforcement in the courts it would be expensive – but it is unlikely to get to this in most cases: usually the matter can be resolved between the parties.
2. Where do I get an NDA and will it be expensive?
NDAs come in two basic flavours:
- one-way (where only one party is disclosing confidential information and the other party is receiving it, for example, so it can review it and decide whether investment or purchase is worthwhile); or
- mutual (where both parties are disclosing confidential information to each other: this is likely to be the case for collaboration/joint venture type arrangements).
In some circumstances where an NDA is to be used, one party may have a standard form document they always use but don’t worry if not. There are lots of free and inexpensive templates for both one-way and mutual NDAs on the internet – do a search and you should find plenty of examples.
You will probably need to tailor them a bit – include names and addresses and perhaps a “Purpose” (ie stating the reason that you are sharing the information). It then clear that information disclosed is to be used only for the stated purpose – and not for anything else.
3. Who needs to be a party the Agreement?
This is something you need to think about. The most straight forward situation is where two companies are entering into an NDA: they then accept responsibility for their employees keeping information confidential.
But sometimes one of the parties will be an individual and should, therefore, be a party to the NDA personally. This may be OK if the individual is a “disclosing party”. However if he or she is a “receiving party” and breaches the agreement, he or she could be sued personally for everything they own.
4. Lots of NDAs look very different: are they really the same?
Well, they may seem different but the truth of this is that most of it is window dressing. There are common elements which are always the same (although there may be extras – see point 5 below).
The core elements are as follows:
- Definition of Confidential Information
There will be something along these lines but it may be called something different – eg “the Information”, “the Disclosed Information”.
Often the definition of confidential information is very general – “all information about the business, customers, suppliers, know- how etc”.
Others definitions go the other way and say everything is confidential – so by implication even trivial and obvious things are covered.
A compromise would be for the definition to say it covers information that is confidential in nature.
- Exceptions (that is, what is not Confidential Information)
Typically, one or more of the following will be “carved out” from the general definition of the “Confidential Information”.
- Information in the public domain or which is publicly available (other than as a result of breach of the Non-Disclosure Agreement by the recipient of confidential information)
- Information required to be disclosed by law or order of a court etc.
- Information already known to the recipient or independently developed by it (for example, as a result of its own research).
- Use of the Confidential Information
This part of the Agreement will say how information can be used and that it mustn’t be used for anything else. There may be more detail about this, for example, the recipient won’t make copies, will take reasonable measures to keep information secure and so on.
There will also probably be something about the return/destruction or deletion of information at the end of discussions or if the relevant project doesn’t go ahead. In any event usually there is something that says, whatever happens, the confidentiality obligation is on-going. This might be indefinite or for a specified period (such as 2, 5, 10 years).
There may also be a provision allowing sharing of information with professional advisers, consultants, employees, if they need to know about it in connection with the project under discussion. If this is the case, the party sharing the information is usually made responsible for ensuring that that people they share comply with the terms of the NDA, even if they don’t actually sign it.
5. Extras: Bells, Whistles
You know how lawyers like to cover every possibility under the sun? Well, you may find “bells and whistles” included in NDAs in the form of clauses along the following lines:
- The fact we are disclosing information to you (especially intellectual property) doesn’t give you a right (licence) to use it.
- We are providing this confidential information but we are not giving any representations or warranties that it is correct and we won’t update it. (This may or may not be reasonable – you need consider the wider context of the arrangements in each case).
- If there is a breach of the NDA, it is agreed that damages will not be an adequate remedy. (The point of this is to make it clear that if there is a breach, the party who is disadvantaged should have the right to get an injunction to prevent the disclosure – actually, this would cost thousands – even tens of thousands – so probably a last resort).
6. Dragons!
This is how I think of those clauses you need to beware of. Particularly, if you are receiving information you want to avoid clauses that say something like:
“you agree to indemnify the disclosing party for all costs, claims, demands and liabilities arising directly or indirectly out of a breach.”
The problem is that, if you agree to this then potentially you are going to have to compensate the disclosing party for everything that your breach of the NDA costs them (including the cost of any injunction (see above!)). Not good news.
Ideally, you would try to get the disclosing party to agree that your liability won’t exceed a specified amount – but this isn’t always possible. If it isn’t, try to ensure that the party who claims to have lost out has to prove it and take reasonable steps to minimise any loss suffered.
Remember if the party signing the NDA is a company or corporation, if the worst comes to worst, its liability will be limited. That won’t be the case for an individual ..(see point 3 above).
7. Boilerplate
In addition to the provisions discussed above, there will probably be some of the “standard” clauses you typically find in legal agreements (usually known as “boilerplate”). Examples are, clauses about how notices should be given, what law will govern the agreement and so on
Pretty much all NDAs will have the elements described above – although the Bells, Whistles and Dragons are optional. So don’t worry they aren’t as bad as they seem.
Please don’t be put off by the fact that NDAs can seem daunting at first. In fact, when you have looked at a few you will get quite used to them and the general principles. So my suggestion is that you get familiar with them since they are definitely worth having in place to protect your business information, if you are sharing it with others as part of potential arrangement between the two of you.
What are your thoughts on this? Please do share them below.
Latest posts by Kim (see all)
- Do you know what’s important in a Non-Disclosure Agreement? - June 1, 2012
5 crazy ways to get Buyers to your website

Subscribe and give yourself an unfair advantage!









14 Responses to Do you know what’s important in a Non-Disclosure Agreement?
Hi Kim,
Good solid article. I spent 10 years working for an international defence company and NDAs are vital in that business.
As a web developer I have a general confidentiality clause in my agreements but I also have one client who required an NDA not a problem. I welcome them.
NDAs are there to protect both parties and very valuable. I speak to a lot of people who share their commercial ideas and plans and an NDA just makes sense.
Have a great weekend,
Alex
Alex Adams recently posted..Keeping the lid on your cookie jar
Twitter: jujudigital
Hi Alex,
Thanks for that. Glad you found it useful and agree that NDAs are very useful. Enjoy the holiday weekend.
Kim
Twitter: kimawhitaker
As a small business owner with a limited budget, I found this post by Kim Whitaker extremely helpful, clear and easy to understand. We have never worried about NDA’s before, but confidentiality is of course extremely important to counsellors – our reputation rests on people’s ability to trust us with all sorts of information. So I will definitely think more clearly about confidentiality agreements in the future.
Twitter: shefcounselling
Hi,
Yes they are important but as Alex says often the issue is covered in terms and conditions (sometimes there is an NDA at the preliminary stage) and then a clause in the agreement if the parties go ahead. Perhaps you already have something in the agreements you use with clients or on your website about this?
Thanks for your comment.
Kim
Kim Whitaker recently posted..How to enjoy networking
Twitter: kimawhitaker
Kim, what an informative, thoughtful article. I like how you poke a little fun at lawyers, too. It really brings out your authenticity. This is an excellent resource, thank you.
Nadine Nicholson recently posted..Freedom is in you. Have you chosen?
Twitter: NadineNicholson
Thanks Nadine, glad you find it useful.
Kim
Kim Whitaker recently posted..How to enjoy networking
Twitter: kimawhitaker
Fine piece – thanks.
We frequently use NDAs & although I’m unsure whether they can ever be fully enforceable they certainly ‘concentrate the mind’ & are a barrier to information release/illegal sharing…
With regards,
Norman
recent blogs: http://www.simplyfone.com/blogs.php
Twitter: SimplyFone
Hi Norman,
It is the cost of enforcement that is the issue…but usually it doesn’t come to that – and, as you say, it reminds people of the issues involved.
Thanks for taking the time to comment.
Kim
Kim Whitaker recently posted..How to enjoy networking
Twitter: kimawhitaker
Not worth the paper they are written on and an excuse for a lawyer to rip the profits out of every deal.
Steve Hall recently posted..From The Air
Twitter: thisisspain
You are, of course, entitled to your own opinion but in the blog I was trying to explain how you can deal do one yourself and involve lawyers fees.
Some people think NDAs aren’t worth doing unless you can afford full litigation to enforce, but the fact is it doesn’t usually get to that. And it is helpful to have one so if someone breaches you can at least say – look, we’ve signed an agreement and you’ve breached it, stop now and let’s minimise the damage.
Kim Whitaker recently posted..How to enjoy networking
Twitter: kimawhitaker
The NDA was the biggest hassle while negotiating in my previous role with a major health insurer. Get the NDA before ever discussing any services agreement they’d say to us. Try to negotiate one way NDA with small business owners only makes a services agreement that much more contentious to negotiate after. The best way: have a nice ploy or tactic that tests the other parties character. When negotiating I loved to let the little guy know up front he can keep his little mney saved on the side if we wanted was the market access and or clientele. Doesn’t work everytime but often times there’s no need if you know you’ll get a masterservices agreement done as it should cover most types of disclosure.
Interesting to hear your views. NDAs are used in so many circumstances that it is difficult to have a one size fits all answer. I know that often in tender circumstances the party sending out the tender docs insist that an NDA is signed before you can get access to the other docs – and in those circumstances there isn’t much scope for negotiation. Often preliminary NDAs are too restrictive if a relationship goes ahead and, of course, there will often be a confidentiality provision in any more detailed agreement entered into by the parties. In those circumstances you would probably want to ensure that the provision in the detailed agreement override the preliminary NDA.
Kim Whitaker recently posted..Ten Ideas On How To Use Evernote For Your Business
Twitter: kimawhitaker
Hi im trying to develop a prototype for an invention I have came up with. I need a CAD designer and I will need a patent lawyer in the future, should I make them both sign NDA? Should I get a second lawyer for the NDA to make sure the patent lawyer can’t find any loop holes?
You will definitely need an NDA for the CAD Designer (although if you have an agreement with them there may be something about confidentiality in that) but you may need one for discussions first.
If you have signed up as a client with the patent lawyer (or will you be using a patent attorney?) before disclosing details then I suspect that their terms of business will already confidentiality provisions in them – lawyers are under a general obligation of confidentiality to their clients anyway. You could ask the lawyer to sign another NDA if you felt happier but I don’t think you need to get a separate lawyer to draft it. Generally a lawyer isn’t trying to find a loopholes in his/her own client’s NDA. It would damage them or their firm too much if it came out they had disclosed client confidential information..it would breach their professional conduct requirements.
Hope that helps.
Kim Whitaker recently posted..Guest Post: Why LinkedIn Drives so much Traffic to my Site
Twitter: kimawhitaker